Everything you need in 3 minutes
Gaming Is Good is a thesis with evidence. Here's the argument, the framework, and the fastest path to finding value for you specifically.
01
Games are a decision lab
Strategic games compress the plan-act-feedback cycle into sessions measured in hours, not quarters. That density of repetition is what builds expertise.
02
The skills transfer
Systems optimization. Long-horizon planning. Risk quantification. These are named disciplines in Operations Research. Games train them faster than any classroom.
03
Stoicism closes the loop
The feedback only works if you receive it honestly. Stoic disposition is what prevents rationalization. Without it, the lab teaches you nothing.
Choose Your Path
Where do you want to start?
For the professional reader
Find your decision-maker archetype
Four personas. Each maps to a different set of professional cognitive edges. Find yours and get a curated game list built around your actual skill gaps.
Find my persona →
For the curious gamer
Browse the library by skill
Already gaming? Find out which of your habits are building transferable skills and which ones are just entertainment. No judgment either way.
Explore the games →
For the OR/DS practitioner
Explore the skill taxonomy
Formal definitions of each decision science skill this site covers, with professional analogs and the games that develop them most directly.
See the taxonomy →
For the skeptic
Read the research log
This is a thesis, not a settled conclusion. Here's what has been validated, what hasn't, and what I'm actively working to prove. Receipts first, claims second.
See the evidence →
The Core Framework
The Trifecta
Three elements. Each one necessary. None of them sufficient alone. The argument is that you need all three to build a professional who consistently makes good decisions under uncertainty.
Stoicism
The disposition that makes honest feedback possible. Without it, every loss is someone else's fault and every win confirms your genius. The lab teaches you nothing.
Strategic Gaming
The fastest feedback environment available for building decision-making cognition. Not casual gaming. Deliberate practice under constraint, with immediate, honest feedback.
Decision Systems
The output. A practitioner who can frame problems correctly, build the right models, and implement decisions that hold up under operational pressure.
Stoicism enables honest feedback loops → Games provide the density of repetitions → Decision Systems is the professional result
See how this thesis is being validated →
The Methodology
The Six Steps
The framework behind the book and the practice. Most teams start at Step 4. That's the dominant failure mode of the last decade.
1
Metaproblem Selection
Choosing which problem is worth solving. The most expensive decision in any project happens before anyone opens a laptop.
2
Problem Framing
Translating a business problem into a precise decision model. This is where the Decision Factory methodology lives.
3
Solutioning
Selecting the appropriate method: optimization, simulation, heuristic, or hybrid. Method follows problem, not the other way around.
4
Data Sourcing
Acquiring the inputs the model requires. Most teams start here. That's the problem.
⚠ The dominant failure mode: beginning here and reverse-engineering a justification for the data you have.
5
Build
Proof of Concept → Pilot → MVP → Production. Each stage exists to validate the prior stage's assumptions, not to accelerate delivery.
6
Return to Step 1
Fully. Not partially. Anchoring bias kills more good systems than bad engineering. The hardest discipline in the practice.
Common Questions
The objections I hear most
🎓
John Brandon Elam
Decision Systems Leader · Bit Bros Publishing
I'm a Decision Systems leader with $290M+ in documented profit impact at Toyota. I write, consult, and teach one idea: decisions can be engineered. My books (Bit Bros) and Gaming Is Good series are where that idea meets practice.